Bradley Manning Charged in Wikileaks Case – NowPublic

5 Responses to “Bradley Manning Charged in Wikileaks Case – NowPublic”

1. Anna says:

   6 July 2010 at 9:30 pm

   Bradley Manning is a hero. The U.S. MSM will not show the American people what has been happening in Iraq. Hundreds of thousands dead and injured, millions have been displaced.

   What did our government and the military learn from Vietnam? Do not show the American public the pictures, don’t count the dead and injured, and control the media. That is all they learned

   Bradley Manning thank you
   • Creed *Salutes Bradley Manning* says:

     9 July 2010 at 9:46 am

     I sec0nd that Anna…

     “What did our government and the military learn from Vietnam? Do not show the American public the pictures, don’t count the dead and injured, and control the media. That is all they learned.”

     Bradley Manning has acted properly in this situation. If only more would do so, the government would have to give account for its war and finance-related abuses and failures.
2. Creed *Salutes Bradley Manning* says:

   9 July 2010 at 9:53 am

   U.S. is becoming more and more populated with Israeli-intelligence wonks and financial pigs who do their worst and do not answer for their statutory crimes. To punish Manning in this situation is the greater wrong.

   Why are the shooters being held away from accountability? They fired on maturing kids traveling with reporters, trying to help their family or neighbors to get to hospital, after their uncle or elder had been shot from long range; was crawling on the ground; probably pleading for help.

   These guys in helicopter gun ships did not have probably cause as there is suppose to be some discernment where medical-aid persons were due to arrive in the area.

   The people were standing upright talking with a group of two or more reporters; not firing or seeking cover is in a skirmish.

   The voices of the gun ship operators, lend to a cold cruelty and brutality of the large rounds being fired from a distance like that.

   The people on the ground looked mostly like clean-up personnel, or a volunteer medical unit, told to go in and look for survivors or get people to hospital for their wounds. See if stray children were left unattended, etc.

   The video reeks of war crimes and failure to observe Geneva Conventions.
3. Creed *Salutes Bradley Manning* says:

   9 July 2010 at 10:21 am

   Obama goes after this kid for doing the right duty, in disclosing what would otherwise be hidden. Then Obama turns his face away from massive frauds in large American banks and pattern offenses.

   If it was Muslim-owned banks and financiers, distributing “toxic assets” in American pension funds and competitor firms around the country, do you think Obama would be so casual?

   So long as it is non-Muslim owned banks and financiers do their worst, Obama thinks it is kosher.

   What clowns we are unfortunate to have in Treasury, appointed by the last two presidents.

   Has anyone asked Obama if the generals and financier-engineers in high credit market frauds and securitization markets, deserve to be paid like professional athletes?

   Imagine if it was Muslim bankers who are responsible for reducing lending standards in the same four years, credit agencies are compromised and corrupted? Do you think our media would be encouraging bag-of-bolts-Obama to look forward and not behind?

   All this above happened in the same four years of decline, at the end of the prior administration’s various campaigns. If it was Muslim financiers creating “complex financial instruments” designed to go bad at the same time as they are created, do you think George W. Bush would be favorable to negotiate with financial terrorists and surrender capitalism, in a rose-garden speech, at the end of his tour?

   Bush and Obama = dumb and dumber.

   All praise Jewish owned media in America, otherwise, you might have some actual,/i>justice in your lives.
4. Mike Gogulski says:

   9 July 2010 at 8:24 pm

   @Creed: I think you get it partly right and partly wrong.

   Religion and race aren’t at issue here. What’s at issue is alliances which transcend anything other than mutual agreement and conspiracy to support each other in carrying out massive crimes.

   Some people, such as myself, look at this in terms of ruling classes. Obama is part of (but certainly not head of) one of a number of ruling classes with international scope. Within the US, Dem and Rep “contention” is nothing like fight-to-the-death opposition, but merely differences of emphasis among factions of a ruling class which agrees fundamentally on their right to rule and exploit others. That same group has very strong ties to ruling class elements in the UK and elsewhere.

   So, yes, if it were Muslim bankers bilking the treasury for trillions, of course Obama would go after them… unless they happened to be Muslim banker’s on the team Obama supports.