Comments on: Update 3/11/13: Contra Bill Keller, Bradley Manning’s motives consistent from chat logs through plea statement http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement Exposing war crimes is not a crime! Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:24:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Ellen Mosen James http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1515 Ellen Mosen James Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:58:54 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1515 Good for all of you who caught this and marshalled your evidence so well. I absolutely agree with your conclusion.
More on this and Bradley’s fine statement later.
Ellen James

]]>
By: Jim http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1513 Jim Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:16:52 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1513 “conscious” correct for miss spell:( re-run/

]]>
By: Jim http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1512 Jim Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:16:58 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1512 Technically WIKI is not a declared enemy of the United States of America. Material that was not of military proprietary ownership should be excluded and “other classified material” along with the magnification to the charges they represent.

If those “classified” videos, field memo’s did not represent operational strategies and were not having a value greater than as a historical reference (the bar that you can, with a clear conches, walk Manning under) Pvt Manning should be, without further delay, out-processed with general discharge for misconduct & time served.

PFC Bradley Manning needs something (easy-out) and the Department of Defense may need something as well, that something could be a Bilateral terms of agreement to separate.

Everyone joining the Department of Defense does so with a contract. That initial contract expires when the terms are fulfilled and when the initial contract is broken there is a disposition letter written that is placed into the service members files. The disposition letter is a reflection of the accounts resulting to the type of discharge. Now run the Bilateral in one direction and it should produce a smooth orderly flow in the right direction.
The disposition letter and the bilateral agreement are one in the same

The Bilateral Terms should express with understanding that Pvc Bradey Manning has full responsibility and is not being held accountable by the Department of Defense for having State Departments illegaly accessed classified cable documents and so forth. The Bilateral Terms should also express with understanding that all matters regarding the State Department property is for pubic exposure through the United States Attorney General. ( using peep sheet slider technology )

Parties to the agreement could exchange guilty plea(s) for the statuette of limitations being EXECUTED at the time of separation and that this Statuette being struck down will be for public exposure also. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Statuette of Limitation does not exist so therefor when the parties to the bilateral terms of agreement agree to exchange plea(s) for Statuette of limitations, it is done prior to separation and under the umbrella of the Uniform Code of Militaty Justice.
Credits to devteam, need redsnow beta 4. Also apple i5, law & order, mom and dad, ****General Linge. Keep cracken

“Your jailbroke” Bradley Manning run and stay off the FBI radar you cost me a headache. DOD send a check maybe 2 weeks vacation at Fort Meade. Beer, Rum what ever. oyaa party time!

]]>
By: JoeP http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1511 JoeP Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:13:08 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1511 Bradley Manning is most decidedly a true, honest, genuine, estimable American hero!

Bill Keller seems to be the opposite.

]]>
By: Evan http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1510 Evan Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:35:26 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1510 A sad attempt to attack Bradley’s character, knowing that virtually none of the readers will do their own fact checking.

]]>
By: debra jorgensen http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1509 debra jorgensen Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:33:21 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1509 This is Debra Jorgensen, Waterloo, N.Y., Bradly Manning is a hero of his peers,(ME!), an unpretentious person at the right place, at the right time. Mr. President, let this man go! The unjust torture by government croners of this man is criminal! Wikileaks has the world to thank, and they are on the “right” side of global history. N.Y. Times, you are not. My purchases of your publication have ended, though,(being a true American and savy consumer) you can redeem yourselves,as I’m sure there are voices among your staff whom adhere to American truisms. “Live free or die”

]]>
By: Lindi http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1508 Lindi Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:35:50 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1508 Link in my previous comment has joined itself to the word ‘only’ and so it doesn’t work.

Should be http://wiseupaction.info/bradley-manning-in-his-own-words/

]]>
By: Lindi http://bradleymanning.org/press/update-31113-contra-bill-keller-bradley-mannings-motives-consistent-from-chat-logs-through-plea-statement#comment-1507 Lindi Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:31:27 +0000 http://bradleymanning.org/?p=28017#comment-1507 There may be lots of ‘other’ stuff in the chat logs, but there is absolutely not lots of ‘other’ stuff relating to motive.

Anyone used to parsing texts accurately can ‘hear’ that whenever in the chat logs Brad is referring to his motivation and intentions regarding the leaks his ‘voice’ is unambiguous in it’s moral clarity.

He doesn’t ever falter in his belief that he has taken moral action.

He doesn’t even really falter in his belief that his action will be effective, considering momentarily whether he’s just ‘naive’, but coming out against this by saying ‘well, it should be better’ and ‘if it’s out in the open, it should be a public good.’

Bradley Manning – ‘in his own words’ at http://wiseupaction.info/bradley-manning-in-his-own-words/only contains what pertains to motive from the chat logs – ie it’s the chat logs with everything else taken out. Read it through for yourself.

Anyone reading that would have to be seeing things to extrapolate mixed motives from it. There’s nothing in it you can even begin to twist (even if you’re Bill Keller.) He’s just WRONG.

And there’s NO WAY he could back up his assertion with detail or examples.

]]>