Comments on: Update 3/4/13: Bradley’s attorney seeking approval to release “official” statement

By: April Cahill

April Cahill — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:43:41 +0000

If there were more people who had guts in the military that would all stand together, we would have a better military and wouldn’t have so many wasted years and dollars on unjust murders and lies like those that have been perpetrated by the 13 US Intelligence Agencies and US Military Machine since the CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CLAIMING ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT BY US INTELLIGENCE was thrown out for lack of evidence in the Carolines in 1998

By: Kevin Stoda

Kevin Stoda — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:03:50 +0000

The continued prosecution and prison time for a national hero whistle blower, a person of conscience, does not make this or any other American–including Americans active abroad, like soldiers–feel any safer.

Period.

Demand an early release for Bradley and demand open courtrooms in America.

END THE SECRETS NOW.

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:58:17 +0000

Parties to a agreement may have to trade guilty plea(s) for the statute of limitations executed at separation.

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:06:39 +0000

The Bilateral Terms should express with understanding that there is no accountability of the State Departments illegaly accessed clasified cable documents and so forth. The B/Terms should also express with understanding that all matters regarding the State Department property is for pubic exposure through the United States Attorney General.

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:46:18 +0000

Everyone joining the Department of Defense does so with a contract. That initial contract expires when the terms are fulfilled and when the initial contract is broken there is a disposition letter written that is placed into the service members files. The disposition letter is a reflection of the accounts resulting to the type of discharge. Now run the Bilateral in one direction and it should produce a smooth orderly flow in the right direction.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:53:57 +0000

Reposting do to typographical error: PFC B Manning needs something and the Department of Defense may need something as well, that something could be a Bilateral terms of agreement to separate.

By: Jim

Jim — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:46:56 +0000

PFC B Manning needs something as well as the Department of Defense needing something and that something could be a Bilateral terms of agreement to separate.

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:59:28 +0000

If those “classified” videos, field memo’s did not represent operational strategies and were not having a value greater than as a historical reference, Pvt Manning should be, without further delay, out-processed with general discharge for misconduct & time served.

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:52:31 +0000

Technically WIKI is not a declared enemy of the United States of America. Material that was not of military proprietary ownership should be excluded “other classified material” along with the magnification to the charges they represent.

By: Connie Headrick

Connie Headrick — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:56:49 +0000

Oh I wish for a full pardon of Bradley Manning. He did what IS right! Where is the prosecution of the animals who killed human beings like they were non-human decoys & took sheer delight in it? Where is that prosecution? Following orders did NOT hold up for those on trial at Nurenburgh, and I want those animals on trial – NOT Bradley Manning!