(English) RELEASE: Military steps up retaliation against accused WikiLeaks whistle-blower with arbitrary ”suicide watch”, followed by detainment of approved visitor
2011-01-246 comments
Tyvärr är denna artikel enbart tillgänglig på English.
You are either part of the paving machine, or you are part of the road, Brad. Sorry.
2011-01-24 08:56
tricia
it almost seems as though the military is attempting to present themselves as superior to the constitution, the barbaric conditions of Bradley Manning are extreme and unjust. these are very sad days in America when the American people have no greater fear than the fear of our own military. The article makes a good point about the military feeling a sense of growing support for Bradley which is probably why its getting worse, as an attempt to instill fear upon supporters
2011-01-24 09:29
Spuds McKenzie
”the military is attempting to present themselves as superior to the constitution”?
President Obama — Commander In Chief. The bucks stops in the Oval Office right here and now in 2011. He is responsible for any crimes you think are being perpetrated against bradass87.
2011-01-26 15:18
ron norris
This may sound radical, but i say we need to draft some sort of rules to outline some basic rights of humankind. We’ll call it the bill of rights,, has a ring to it. Freedom of speech might be a good right ,right to a speedy trial,maybe innocent until proven guilty, or no pre trial torture. Also to be nice pre trial torture really should’t be supervised by the ones whose stand to be charged with crime . (military officers) by the tortured one’s (Manning’s) testimony.A free press would be a big help in guaranteeing the rights,tho under the present state of our government this might be going too far. Many innocent defense contractors could be trampled by disillusioned stockholders if a free press irresponsibly yelled fire in a crowded war. There really is a fire , now how do we get this darn thing out,, hope its charged.
2011-02-08 10:07
Sandra
As someone once said again and shown the truth and because some are afraid now and everything should be covered up again, he must now be removed for it, so anything can still be swept under the table, as it is everywhere! I think it’s great what Bradley did, and I’m on his side and hope for him, some come to their senses soon and he can live in freedom!
By the way … my husband is in the army and was 2 years ago for use in Afghanistan! We have 2 children, one of which is as old as the girl in the video. If my husband would have done something like that, like the men in the helicopter, then had to pack his things may, for such a man I had not left everything in the vicinity of my children! The men in the helicopter, because the more witty and thought, and the control devices are but the real criminals!
P.S. This text I have translated by Google … sorry for it if errors are!
2011-02-14 04:27
paul
Why is he the wiki leaks whistleblower? He was really releasing these to the American public and using not only wikileaks but NYTimes etc to do so. Why not be honest and call him the Wikileaks/Nytimes/everyone who shared these docs with another person whistleblower?
Or is this web site in the biz of protecting major media?
Bradley Manning Support Network - All material on this website is released into the public domain unless otherwise indicated. Link and attribution appreciated. - Free Bradley Manning.
You are either part of the paving machine, or you are part of the road, Brad. Sorry.
it almost seems as though the military is attempting to present themselves as superior to the constitution, the barbaric conditions of Bradley Manning are extreme and unjust. these are very sad days in America when the American people have no greater fear than the fear of our own military. The article makes a good point about the military feeling a sense of growing support for Bradley which is probably why its getting worse, as an attempt to instill fear upon supporters
”the military is attempting to present themselves as superior to the constitution”?
President Obama — Commander In Chief. The bucks stops in the Oval Office right here and now in 2011. He is responsible for any crimes you think are being perpetrated against bradass87.
This may sound radical, but i say we need to draft some sort of rules to outline some basic rights of humankind. We’ll call it the bill of rights,, has a ring to it. Freedom of speech might be a good right ,right to a speedy trial,maybe innocent until proven guilty, or no pre trial torture. Also to be nice pre trial torture really should’t be supervised by the ones whose stand to be charged with crime . (military officers) by the tortured one’s (Manning’s) testimony.A free press would be a big help in guaranteeing the rights,tho under the present state of our government this might be going too far. Many innocent defense contractors could be trampled by disillusioned stockholders if a free press irresponsibly yelled fire in a crowded war. There really is a fire , now how do we get this darn thing out,, hope its charged.
As someone once said again and shown the truth and because some are afraid now and everything should be covered up again, he must now be removed for it, so anything can still be swept under the table, as it is everywhere! I think it’s great what Bradley did, and I’m on his side and hope for him, some come to their senses soon and he can live in freedom!
By the way … my husband is in the army and was 2 years ago for use in Afghanistan! We have 2 children, one of which is as old as the girl in the video. If my husband would have done something like that, like the men in the helicopter, then had to pack his things may, for such a man I had not left everything in the vicinity of my children! The men in the helicopter, because the more witty and thought, and the control devices are but the real criminals!
P.S. This text I have translated by Google … sorry for it if errors are!
Why is he the wiki leaks whistleblower? He was really releasing these to the American public and using not only wikileaks but NYTimes etc to do so. Why not be honest and call him the Wikileaks/Nytimes/everyone who shared these docs with another person whistleblower?
Or is this web site in the biz of protecting major media?