Comments on: Notes on Bradley Manning’s motion hearing, June 6
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6
Exposing war crimes is not a crime!Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:06:20 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1By: Bo
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6#comment-3403
BoFri, 08 Jun 2012 08:48:25 +0000http://bradleymanning.org/?p=23961#comment-3403I salute those of you who have been on the scene at the hearing.
]]>By: rose zacchi
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6#comment-3402
rose zacchiFri, 08 Jun 2012 02:59:11 +0000http://bradleymanning.org/?p=23961#comment-3402Great reporting, Nathan!
Thank you!
]]>By: Heidi Lucken
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6#comment-3401
Heidi LuckenThu, 07 Jun 2012 18:41:34 +0000http://bradleymanning.org/?p=23961#comment-3401About that security guard stooping over and stating (ruffly): Don’t those people have jobs.
#1. His job is to protect me
#2. He gets to have a job b/c I pay taxes
#3. He needs to practice serving ME a little bit better
]]>By: Martine
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6#comment-3400
MartineThu, 07 Jun 2012 17:45:11 +0000http://bradleymanning.org/?p=23961#comment-3400Great report! I was there and just want to note one minor issue with what you’ve stated. On the teleconference topic you reported that “The judge ruled in favor of the prosecution but offered a compromise: instead of private 802 conferences, we could have a single day hearing in between the already-scheduled hearings to sort out logistical and other minor issues in open court.” but I recall her meaning to be that the extra scheduled day in court would serve to cover non-logistical, i.e., more substantive matters, which is the opposite of what you’ve reported. Maybe I am the one that misunderstood?
]]>By: Justice
http://bradleymanning.org/news/notes-on-bradley-mannings-motion-hearing-june-6#comment-3399
JusticeThu, 07 Jun 2012 16:03:20 +0000http://bradleymanning.org/?p=23961#comment-3399I wonder about the “role” of the (german) hollywood in this case. When you get the german hollywood connection togehter, you get, Tarantino, di Caprio, Clooney, Brad Pitt, Nagelia Jolie, Terry Gilham, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and many others. Obama has german roots, they say in germany. Germany is very proud of theese actors. But, the question is, have they supported the US military with the intention, to hide their crimes, and do they work together with the german propaganda here from germany. As it seemes, Obama kill Bradley Manning. OK, i think, Obama is at last the better, cause there is possibility to talk with him, when Romney is at last a fascist, from the mormons and would like to attack iran and kill Bradley at once. But it seems, that theese, i call it germs hollywood actors, helps the criminal german holocauster industry (Quandts silence, BMW, IG colors, Nestle, and so on), and act against wikileaks, and as i said, hide the unbelieveable war crimes from the bush area. And as it seems, theese hollywood billionäres take brutal lies of “sod” and “sam” lies, to get attention, to do their work as well, controled by the CIA. It is no lie, that the CIA controls the whole media in USA, and with the money support of CLooney with Obama, there are tendencies recognizeable, which points at last, that they all hlep the brutal millitäres to go on with their war crimes.
]]>