Day 6 of Bradley Manning’s pre-trial hearing: In-depth notes from the Art. 32 courtroom

Wednesday, December 20, 2011

Proceedings began at 9am sharp with David Coombs calling Sgt. Daniel Padgett to the stand.

Sgt. Padgett explained that he had been in the Army for the last three years, and prior to that, he was a Marine from 2001 to 2005. When he deployed with the Army to Iraq in October 2009, he held the rank of Specialist and functioned as a 35F intelligence analyst. PFC Manning was also a Specialist 35F. Since then, Padgett has been promoted to Sergeant, and has been trained as a 35L counter intelligence agent.

Sgt. Padgett explained that he was tasked to be the NCOIC (non-commissioned officer in charge) of the night shift of the intel office—although as a Specialist, he was not yet a non-commissioned officer. His job was to oversee operations of the night shift, but he had no real guidance or formal training to do so. Sgt. Padgett noted that there was no clear chain of command between him and PFC Manning, whom he was supposed to supervise.

Sgt. Padgett outlined a December 2009 incident when PFC Manning was late for work. Sgt. Padgett requested the ability to counsel PFC Manning regarding this incident. Later, when counseling PFC Manning in the S2 intelligence office regarding the importance of being on time for his shift, PFC Manning blankly stared straight ahead, and then flipped the table into the air. Two computers and a radio crashed to the ground. Sgt. Padgett put his hand on PFC Manning to calm him down. Moments later, the Chief Warrant Officer put PFC Manning in a “full nelson” style wrestling head lock.

Sgt. Padgett responded that no one in the chain of command asked him about what happened that day, nor was any UCMJ action taken against PFC Manning for the incident.

With no further questions from PFC Manning’s attorney David Coombs, the prosecution had Sgt. Padgett confirm that opsec (operation security) and infosec (information security) were topics covered prior to deployment, and that 35F’s had signed non-disclosure agreements regarding classified information. Sgt. Padgett explained that “you just know” to safe guard classified information.

With no further questions from the prosecution, the Investigating Officer inquired into the use of music, movies, and games in the SCIF.

Sgt. Padgett explained that music was initially authorized, and that movies were watched on unclassified computers. There were also a couple of games on the office shared drive.

Sgt. Padgett was permanently excused from the stand.

PFC Manning’s attorney David Coombs called Captain Barclay Keay to the stand. Capt. Keay gave testimony via speakerphone.

Capt. Keay deployed to Iraq in November 2009. It was his second deployment, but his first in an S2 (intelligence) position. He was assigned to be the OIC (officer in charge) of the SCIF night shift at FOB Hammer. His only troops on that night shift were all specialists: Bradley Manning, Daniel Padgett, and Cooley.

Capt. Keay explained that the primary work of the SCIF occurred during the day shift, and the night shift simply helped with tasks that carried over from the day shift. Capt. Keay was in this position for “only about three weeks,” during which time he asked almost everyone, from officers to the lower ranking enlisted, about which actual procedures were in place. He received various answers to his questions.

Capt. Keay explained that soldiers commonly listened to music. He assumed soldiers watched videos and played video games, but he never “caught anyone with their hands in the cookie jar” as they probably hid those on screen windows when they saw him coming. Capt. Keay acknowledged that in a sworn statement (probably as part of a “Secretary of the Army 156 investigation”) that listening to music was simply tolerated as accepted practice in the SCIF, despite his formal training otherwise. Capt. Keay noted that he now knows what a SCIF “should look like”: No music, videos, or games on secure computers.

Capt. Keay explained that his interactions with PFC Manning were limited. However, he believed that PFC Manning “wanted to be a good soldier,” and that PFC Manning did “good analytical work.”

The IO asked if there were any other witnesses.

David Coombs noted that this was the final defense witness for the Article 32 hearing, because all other defense witnesses were not allowed by the IO to be questioned.

The IO asked PFC Manning if he understood his right to make a statement, and his right to not make a statement. PFC Manning, in very quick speech, said what I understood to be “I understand, sir” (but it was not at all clear).

The IO then asked PFC Manning if he wished to make a statement. PFC Manning replied “No, sir.”

It was now 9:40am. The IO moved to recess the proceedings until 9:00am, Thursday, December 22, for closing statements by the prosecution and defense. David Coombs objected to the delay by noting that both the defense and prosecution should be ready to make closing statements by 4:00pm today—giving both sides plenty of time to prepare.

The IO upheld the prosecution’s argument that there was a pre-existing agreement to do closing statements on Thursday, regardless of today’s very early finish.

Hearing in recess until 9am, Thursday, December 22.

8 thoughts on “Day 6 of Bradley Manning’s pre-trial hearing: In-depth notes from the Art. 32 courtroom

  1. The truth is, we can’t really get a ‘whole picture’ without defense witnesses. This is a pretty rigged ‘pre-trial’. I hope Coombs comes out swinging today!

  2. The sheer stupidity of after the fact persecution, punishment in a vane effort to put the cat back in the bag and get all those crawling worms back into the can, such is the self-crucifying thought pattern of a dieing Empire.

    For light forces all darkness to give way and if you can’t stand the exposure, then feel your way deeper into darkness.


    Surely wisdom is in direct proportion to humility, which is in reverse proportion to rank, glorification and privilege. Which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that only if the judges were buck privates could Manning be spared a kangaroo court run by moral imbeciles.


    If there were ever a battle between the noonday sun and the dead of night — which would totally destroy the other?

    And so it is with the battle between Manning’s enlightenment and government brainwash darkness, and for an absolute if corporate owned media had reported the truth, single-handedly Manning’s massive amount of light would have so illuminated all the corruption done behind closed doors that we would now have all new politicians, tax payer funded elections and all our troops back home rebuilding infrastructure.

    So, the corporate rich owning and funding all of mainstream media, all news (new reality) converted to propaganda and misinformation, what does this actually accomplish? Well, it mixes light with darkness such that you see light as darkness, fall in love with darkness and hate those who walk in the light thinking they be most evil darkness.

    For darkness is an illusion of good hiding misery, a liar’s pretense of good hiding an intent to be enriched upon our misery, and light the only thing under the sun that can possible end such misery.

  5. I don’t know that posts from people like ‘nobody’ are appropriate for this site. I’d like to see his/her post deleted. It’s just a thoughtless, hate based emotive response. We have a ‘legal process’ in this country for many reasons. Bradley Manning and his current plight is one of those reasons. Manning is a HERO!

  6. So, Nobody, I take your statement to mean that you approve of:

    1) Troops murdering innocent unarmed civilians

    2) Getting rid of the presumption of innocence to allow lengthy & severe punishment prior to even the first court appearance

    3) Summarily disallowing the defense witnesses so a fair trial can’t be had

    4) Governments keeping secrets that have no national security ramifications other than sparing embarrassment or to conceal serious illegal acts.

    Well, if the NDAA is signed, you may just get the country you wish for. Hope you like it for yourself and the people you care about as much as you like it for PFC Manning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>